Lowrey v. Chapman et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Blake Lowrey
Defendant: Joe Chapman, Sgt. Newell, Michelle Dyer and Assistant Site Manager
Case Number: 3:2007cv00114
Filed: October 16, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Athens Office
County: Walton
Presiding Judge: Claude W. Hicks
Presiding Judge: Clay D. Land
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 85 Report and Recommendationsre 77 MOTION for Reconsideration re 76 Judgment, 75 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion for Discovery filed by ANTHONY BLAKE LOWREY. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 2/15/2012. (ggs) ***
March 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 72 Report and Recommendations.; granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 74 Motion for Discovery. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 3/25/2010. (ggs)
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to grant 50 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sergeant Newell; Order denying 59 and 64 MOTIONS for the Court to Order a Certified Copy of Lowrey Deposition. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 3/2/10. (CWH)
February 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 31 Report and Recommendations granting 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Michelle Dyer, denying 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Sgt. Newell. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 2/20/2009 (ggs)
February 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 RECOMMENDATION re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michelle Dyer and 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sergeant Newell. Objections to R&R due by 2/27/2009. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 2/5/09. (CWH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lowrey v. Chapman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Blake Lowrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Newell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Dyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Assistant Site Manager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?