PASQUALETTI v. Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia

Plaintiff: LOUIS PASQUALETTI
Defendant: Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia
Case Number: 3:2013cv00013
Filed: February 6, 2013
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Office: Athens Office
County: Clarke
Presiding Judge: C. Ashley Royal
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 29, 2015 54 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 9/29/15 (lap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PASQUALETTI v. Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LOUIS PASQUALETTI
Represented By: JANET ELIZABETH HILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?