ANDERSON v. FRANKLIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
| TIMOTHY ANDERSON |
| FRANKLIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES |
| 3:2018cv00091 |
| July 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Athens Office |
| Franklin |
| CLAY D LAND |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER to File Prisoner Account Statement (Certified Copy), ORDER to Recast Complaint. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 9/7/2018. (ggs)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from TIMOTHY ANDERSON regarding conditions at Elbert County Jail (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address to Elbert County Jail, problems at Elbert County Jail and request for 1983 packet. (1983 Packet mailed) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to TIMOTHY ANDERSON (ggs) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle issued at the direction of the Court. (ggs)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by TIMOTHY ANDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by TIMOTHY ANDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
