UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
CURRENCY |
JAMAL EICHELBERGER |
3:2018cv00141 |
October 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
C ASHLEY ROYAL |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RULES 16/26 ORDER:Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 1/10/2019. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 12/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Required Form)(lap) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #6 Answer to Complaint filed by CURRENCY ); Other (enter description). The claimant party was not added to the case when the answer was filed. NO NEED TO REFILE - Claimant added to the case. (ggs) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by CURRENCY.(RICHARDSON, MAX)Attorney MAX C RICHARDSON added to party CURRENCY(pty:dft) |
Filing 5 USM285 Process Receipt and Return EXECUTED for CURRENCY. (CRANE, JAMES) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Proceedings by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (CRANE, JAMES) |
Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (ggs) |
Filing 2 WARRANT issued to ARREST property in rem. (ggs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITUREagainst CURRENCY filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: #1 Required Form Verification, #2 Required Form Warrant of Arrest in Rem, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(CRANE, JAMES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.