PUGH v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP

Plaintiff: GLORIA PUGH
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Case Number: 3:2019cv00028
Filed: March 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: C ASHLEY ROYAL
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28:2617
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GLORIA PUGH (HILL, JANET)
March 15, 2019 Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to GLORIA PUGH. (bcl)
March 15, 2019 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to WAL-MART STORES EAST LP. (bcl)
March 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WAL-MART STORES EAST LP Fee paid: Receipt # 113G-3107428, $400 filed by GLORIA PUGH (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(HILL, JANET)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PUGH v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GLORIA PUGH
Represented By: JANET ELIZABETH HILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?