FAVORS v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC et al
| JESSECA FAVORS |
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and COVINGTON CREDIT OF GEORGIA INC |
| 3:2019cv00053 |
| May 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| C ASHLEY ROYAL |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to JESSECA FAVORS (ggs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC. (ggs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to COVINGTON CREDIT OF GEORGIA INC. (ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3173610, $400 filed by JESSECA FAVORS (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Groghan, Scot) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint filed by JESSECA FAVORS ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. NO NEED TO REFILE, corrections made by case manager.(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
