MAY v. PRITCHETT, et al
CHRISTINE MAY |
ELLEN WARREN, DEPUTY JOSEPH PRITCHETT, DONALD B HARRIS, RONALD MILTON, ANDREW A AINSLIE, JR and MACK B BOHLEN |
3:2019cv00082 |
September 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
CLAY D LAND |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by December 23, 2019. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 10/23/2019 (CCL) |
Filing 2 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by ANDREW A AINSLIE, JR, MACK B BOHLEN, DONALD B HARRIS, RONALD MILTON, JOSEPH PRITCHETT filed by DEBORAH DANCE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Consent Motion Accepting Waiver of Service & Setting Date for Morgan Co., Pritchett, Bohlen, Ainslie, Harris & Milton to Respond or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint)(DANCE, DEBORAH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CHRISTINE B MAY Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3263757, $400 filed by CHRISTINE B MAY (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(GOODMARK, CRAIG) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint filed by CHRISTINE MAY ); Notice to Counsel - CRAIG GOODMARK Your contact information in CM/ECF is not current. Please update your contact information via PACER. (ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.