WATTERS v. WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
ROGER GENE WATTERS |
WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, CORRECT HEALTH, LORETTA BUTLER and SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN |
3:2019cv00101 |
November 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
C ASHLEY ROYAL |
CHARLES H WEIGLE |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER to File Prisoner Account Statement (Certified Copy). Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 1/10/2020. (ggs) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by ROGER GENE WATTERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(tlf) |
Filing 5 ORDER to File a properly completed application to proceed IFP and a Prisoner Account Statement (Certified Copy). Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 11/26/2019. (ggs) |
Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to ROGER GENE WATTERS. (ggs) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle issued at the direction of the Court. (ggs) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by ROGER GENE WATTERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by ROGER GENE WATTERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.