GAITHER v. CHAPMAN et al
| RUSSELL GAITHER |
| SGT SHANE MEEKS, CAPTAIN DEAN THRASHER and SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN |
| 3:2020cv00020 |
| February 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| CLAY D LAND |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address to Augusta State Medical Prison. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RUSSELL GAITHER. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint against JOE CHAPMAN, SHANE MEEKS, DEAN THRASHER by RUSSELL GAITHER (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by RUSSELL GAITHER re: #6 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ggs) Modified on 2/24/2020 to link documents. (ggs). |
| Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to RUSSELL GAITHER (ggs) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle issued at the direction of the Court. (ggs)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOE CHAPMAN, SHANE MEEKS, DEAN THRASHER, filed by RUSSELL GAITHER. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
