MILLS et al v. LAST RESORT GRILL INC et al
| Alma Kaempf, Kenneth Martinez, MADISON MCDEARIS, RACHEL MILLS, Allison Barrow, KEELA SINGLETON, Brianna Head, Allyssa Peace and Alexa Armstrong |
| Stanley Walker, Last Resort Grill, Inc. and LAST RESORT GRILL INC |
| 3:2020cv00115 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LAST RESORT GRILL INC (MCCONNELL, KATHRYN) |
| Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Defendant Last Resort Grill, Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss/Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint), MOTION to Strike #4 Amended Complaint/Petition by LAST RESORT GRILL INC filed by KATHRYN L MCCONNELL. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 (Singleton Right-to-Sue Notice), #3 Proposed Order)(MCCONNELL, KATHRYN) |
| Filing 14 RULES 16/26 ORDER:Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 1/14/2021. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 12/3/2020. (ggs) |
| Filing 13 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #12 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court remains skeptical that Defendant's counsel needs 35 pages to brief a partial motion to dismiss. Counsel contends that its analysis is fact intensive, which does not typically bode well for a motion to dismiss, which would generally be based on the acceptance of the truth of Plaintiffs' allegations in the complaint with an analysis of the legal elements of the cause of action as alleged, as distinguished from a motion for summary judgment which may require more analysis as to what the record does and does not support. In any event, the Court has decided to reconsider its previous denial of Defendant's request and will grant counsel the extra pages she seeks. Counsel should be aware, however, that unnecessary verbosity is ineffective written advocacy. All unnecessary words, phrases, and paragraphs should be eliminated. This requires thorough revision, which the Court is confident will result in a brief substantially shorter than the 35 pages permitted. Counsel for Plaintiffs shall have the same increased number of pages for their response and need not file a motion requesting such. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 12/3/2020 (amr) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Reconsideration re 8 Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages by LAST RESORT GRILL INC filed by KATHRYN L MCCONNELL. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(MCCONNELL, KATHRYN) |
| Filing 11 This is a text only entry; no document issued.ORDER. Counsel for Defendant has contacted chambers to obtain insight as to why its motion to exceed page limitations was summarily denied. The Court's standard Rules 16/26 Order, which apparently has not been issued yet in this case because Defendant has not yet made a formal entry of appearance, states "[r]equests for extension of page limitations should rarely be made because such requests generally reflect a failure to focus upon the relevant issues in a concise and thoughtful manner. Therefore, extensions will only be granted in exceptional cases." The Court did not find the circumstances here warranted an exception. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 12/2/2020. (amr) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by SHANNON R CREASY on behalf of LAST RESORT GRILL INC (CREASY, SHANNON) |
| Filing 9 Georgia Attorney Admission Fee Met by SHANNON R CREASY (nop) |
| Filing 8 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER denying #7 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 12/1/2020 (amr). |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Defendant Last Resort Grill, Inc.'s brief in support of its Partial Motion to Dismiss/Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint by LAST RESORT GRILL INC filed by KATHRYN L MCCONNELL. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(MCCONNELL, KATHRYN) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by KATHRYN L MCCONNELL on behalf of LAST RESORT GRILL INC Attorney KATHRYN L MCCONNELL added to party LAST RESORT GRILL INC(pty:dft)(MCCONNELL, KATHRYN) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION (Joint) Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint re #4 Amended Complaint/Petition by LAST RESORT GRILL INC (MCCONNELL, KATHRYN) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED #1 Complaint, against All Defendants by RACHEL MILLS (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Charges, #2 Exhibit Right to Sue)(STECKEL, PETER) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to STANLEY WALKER. (ggs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to LAST RESORT GRILL INC. (ggs) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by Alma Kaempf, Alexa Armstrong, RACHEL MILLS, MADISON MCDEARIS, Allison Barrow, Kenneth Martinez, Allyssa Peace, KEELA SINGLETON, Brianna Head ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. NO NEED TO REFILE.(ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3596620, $400 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Exhibit Charges, #5 Exhibit Right to Sue)(STECKEL, PETER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
