WARD v. CHAFIN et al
MICHAEL CHARLES WARD |
JAMES V CHAFIN, JON FORWOOD, KENNETH W MAULDIN and JOHN DOES |
3:2021cv00111 |
October 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
C ASHLEY ROYAL |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint re #13 Amended Complaint by JAMES V CHAFIN, JON FORWOOD, KENNETH W MAULDIN filed by LAURA LOUISE LONES. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Motion Filed Feb. 3, 2010)(LONES, LAURA) Modified on 12/1/2021 to edit text and to terminate duplicate motion. (ggs). |
Filing 16 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #15 Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Defendants may submit a brief no longer than thirty (30) pages in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amendment Complaint. Ordered by U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE C. ASHLEY ROYAL on 11/29/2021. (ssh) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Defendants' Motion For Extra Pages For Their Brief In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by JAMES V CHAFIN, JON FORWOOD, KENNETH W MAULDIN filed by LAURA LOUISE LONES. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order)(LONES, LAURA) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by MICHAEL CHARLES WARD re #7 MOTION to Dismiss move this court to dismiss this action (HANNON, PATRICK) |
Filing 13 AMENDED #1 Complaint, against All Plaintiffs by MICHAEL CHARLES WARD (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Indictment in 1st Case), #2 Exhibit 2 (Indictment in 2nd Case))(HANNON, PATRICK) |
Filing 12 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #9 Defendants' Motion for Extra Pages for their Brief in Support of their Motion to Dismiss. Defendants may submit a brief of no more than 29 pages in support of their Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE C. ASHLEY ROYAL on 10/27/2021. (ssh) |
Filing 11 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #8 Motion to Stay. For good cause shown, all discovery and pretrial deadlines in this case are hereby STAYED until the Court issues its ruling on Defendants' #7 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE C. ASHLEY ROYAL on 10/27/2021. (ssh) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by PATRICK JOSEPH HANNON on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney PATRICK JOSEPH HANNON added to party MICHAEL CHARLES WARD(pty:pla)(HANNON, PATRICK) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion For Extra Pages For Their Brief In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss by JAMES V CHAFIN, JON FORWOOD, KENNETH W MAULDIN filed by LAURA LOUISE LONES. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order)(LONES, LAURA) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Proceedings by JAMES V CHAFIN, JON FORWOOD, KENNETH W MAULDIN filed by LAURA LOUISE LONES. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Of Their Motion To Stay Proceedings, #2 Proposed Order Order)(LONES, LAURA) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss move this court to dismiss this action by JAMES V CHAFIN, JON FORWOOD, KENNETH W MAULDIN filed by LAURA LOUISE LONES. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Amended Motion filed June 27 2013, #3 Exhibit General Dumurrer filed June 10 2013, #4 Exhibit Motion filed April 16 2013, #5 Exhibit Motion filed June 2 2016, #6 Exhibit Motion filed May 9 2014, #7 Exhibit Motion filed May 10 2013, #8 Exhibit Motion to Amend Motion filed May 11 2016, #9 Exhibit Omnibus Order issued Dec 12 2017, #10 Exhibit Transcript June 12 2014, #11 Exhibit Transcript March 20 2014)(LONES, LAURA) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL CHARLES WARD as to JAMES V CHAFIN. (LAMPROS, PETER) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL CHARLES WARD as to KENNETH W MAULDIN. (LAMPROS, PETER) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL CHARLES WARD as to JON FORWOOD. (LAMPROS, PETER) |
Filing 3 DISREGARD - REFILED AT TAB 6 - SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL CHARLES WARD as to JAMES V CHAFIN. (LAMPROS, PETER) Modified on 10/12/2021 (ggs). |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #3 Summons Returned Executed as to JAMES V. CHAFIN filed by MICHAEL CHARLES WARD : Wrong document attached. Document must be refiled.(ggs) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to JAMES V CHAFIN, JON FORWOOD, KENNETH W MAULDIN. Main Document: Summons JAMES V CHAFIN. (Attachments: #1 Summons JON FORWOOD, #2 Summons KENNETH W MAULDIN)(ggs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3914962, $402 filed by Michael Charles Ward (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Indictment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons to Chafin, #4 Summons to Forwood, #5 Summons to Mauldin)(LAMPROS, PETER) Modified on 10/5/2021 to add description of exhibit and to edit other text. (ggs). |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by Michael Charles Ward ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. ADDITIONALLY, Pursuant to page 13 of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures manual, generic descriptions for exhibits/attachments are not permitted (i.e. Exhibit A, etc.) Future filings with exhibits attached must be properly described. NO NEED TO REFILE exhibit description added by case manager.(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.