BAE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| RACHEL BAE |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
| 3:2022cv00067 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 6/21/2022. (msg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RACHEL BAE filed by FRANCIS EDWARD BUDDE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis). Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(BUDDE, FRANCIS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP) against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY filed by RACHEL BAE (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Summons Attorney General, #4 Summons Regional Chief Counsel, #5 Summons U.S. Attorney)(BUDDE, FRANCIS) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint (IFP), filed by RACHEL BAE ); It is no longer necessary to provide proposed summonses in Social Security Appeal cases. Please see the recently revised Local Rule 9.(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
