GOOLSBY v. CITY OF MONROE et al
ALICIA GOOLSBY |
CITY OF MONROE, BETH THOMPSON and LES RUSSELL |
3:2022cv00082 |
August 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
C ASHLEY ROYAL |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #4 Waiver of Service Executed filed by ALICIA GOOLSBY, #5 Waiver of Service Executed filed by ALICIA GOOLSBY, #3 Waiver of Service Executed filed by ALICIA GOOLSBY ); REMINDER - Documents must be converted into text-searchable PDF format prior to filing. See CM/ECF Administrative Procedures, page 9. Please do not refile, for future reference only.(ggs) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ALICIA GOOLSBY as to BETH THOMPSON. (MOSLEY, ANDREW) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ALICIA GOOLSBY as to LES RUSSELL. (MOSLEY, ANDREW) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ALICIA GOOLSBY as to CITY OF MONROE. (MOSLEY, ANDREW) |
Filing 2 EXHIBIT(S) by ALICIA GOOLSBY re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Right to Sue)(MOSLEY, ANDREW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4154908, $402 filed by ALICIA GOOLSBY (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MOSLEY, ANDREW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.