CLARKE v. WADE et al
| JEROME CLARKE |
| MARY WADE and STEVE CLARKE |
| 3:2023cv00004 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| C ASHLEY ROYAL |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT re #6 Amended Complaint against All Defendants by JEROME CLARKE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order of referral, #2 Envelope)(ggs) Modified on 2/10/2023 to link to amended complaint. (ggs). |
| Filing 6 AMENDED #1 Complaint against All Defendants by JEROME CLARKE (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT (ggs) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JEROME CLARKE. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 2/6/2023. (ggs)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (ggs)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by JEROME CLARKE. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JEROME CLARKE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Quit Claim Deed, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
