MINDEN PICTURES INC v. REHABMART LLC
Plaintiff: MINDEN PICTURES INC
Defendant: REHABMART LLC
Case Number: 3:2024cv00013
Filed: February 15, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: TILMAN E SELF
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by REHABMART LLC filed by ANDREA E BATES. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order for Motion to Dismiss)(BATES, ANDREA)
March 4, 2024 Filing 7 JOINT STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer by REHABMART LLC filed by ANDREA E BATES.(BATES, ANDREA) Modified on 3/4/2024 to correct event.(ggs). Modified on 3/4/2024 to edit title. (ggs).
March 4, 2024 Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by REHABMART LLC ); Wrong event used. The correct event is "STIPULATION." Please DO NOT REFILE, corrected by case manager, motion terminated.(ggs)
February 29, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by ANDREA E BATES on behalf of REHABMART LLC Attorney ANDREA E BATES added to party REHABMART LLC(pty:dft)(BATES, ANDREA)
February 21, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MINDEN PICTURES INC as to REHABMART LLC. (BECKWORTH, FAITH)
February 15, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to REHABMART LLC. (ggs)
February 15, 2024 Filing 3 AO120, Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark. Forwarded this date, by virtue of this notice, to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Alexandria, VA.(ggs)
February 15, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MINDEN PICTURES, INC. (BECKWORTH, FAITH)
February 15, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against REHABMART, LLC Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4577002, $405 filed by MINDEN PICTURES, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Contract, #3 Exhibit 3 - Infringement, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons, #6 AO 121 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright)(BECKWORTH, FAITH)
February 15, 2024 Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by MINDEN PICTURES, INC. ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The attorney case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. Please do not re-file, corrected by case manager.(ggs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MINDEN PICTURES INC v. REHABMART LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MINDEN PICTURES INC
Represented By: FAITH BECKWORTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: REHABMART LLC
Represented By: ANDREA E BATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?