Harvey v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Pauline Harvey
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 4:2008cv00143
Filed: November 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Stewart
Presiding Judge: G. Mallon Faircloth
Presiding Judge: Clay D. Land
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 5/8/2009 (esl)
April 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Pauline Harvey Ordered by U.S. Mag. Judge G. Mallon Faircloth on 4/3/09. (GMF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harvey v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pauline Harvey
Represented By: Charles Lee Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?