Denim North America Holdings, LLC et al v. Swift Textiles, LLC et al
Denim North America LLC and Denim North America Holdings, LLC |
Patriarch Partners, LLC, Galey & Lord, LLC and Swift Textiles, LLC |
4:2010cv00045 |
April 30, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Columbus Office |
Muscogee |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 163 ORDER denying Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law 134 , 148 ; granting equitable relief. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 03/08/2012. (CGC) |
Filing 124 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 96 Motion in Limine. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 10/06/2011. (CGC) |
Filing 121 ORDER denying 83 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 10/04/2011. (CGC) |
Filing 74 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 42 Motion to Dismiss; denying 50 Motion to Strike. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 09/08/2011. (CGC) |
Filing 21 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 1/28/2011. (jbo) |
Filing 20 ORDER denying 9 Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand; denying 14 Defendants' Rule 41(d) Motion for Costs. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 01/12/2011. (jbo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.