Webb v. Haden et al
| Leslie Webb |
| WALKER, FOSTER, Alex Haden and GASTON |
| 4:2012cv00090 |
| April 13, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Columbus Office |
| Harris |
| Stephen Hyles |
| Clay D. Land |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER denying 43 Motion for TRO; granting in part and denying in part 65 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting in part 80 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by U.S. District Judge CLAY D LAND on 9/4/14. (AGH)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 31 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 9/30/13 *** (tls)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendations; CASE TO BE REOPENED and previous judgment entered on June 12, 2012, be VACATED. Plaintiff's filing (ECF No. 24) is hereby construed as an Amended Complaint. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 4/29/13 (tls) ***
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; adopting 8 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 6/12/2012 (tlf).
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff has twenty-one (21) days within which to pay the initial partial filing fee of $6.50. Ordered by US Mag Judge Stephen Hyles on 5/8/12. (AGH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
