CLAY v. TOOMBS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
| KENNETH CLAY |
| TOOMBS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and ROBYN BANKS |
| 4:2018cv00160 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Columbus Office |
| Muscogee |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF TRANSFER transferring proceedings to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D. LAND on 9/7/2018 (tlf).
|
| Case Electronically Transferred Out - District Transfer to Southern District of Georgia. All documents, including a certified copy of the docket sheet and pleading were transferred electronically. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**Case Transfer Acknowledgment deadline 9/21/2018. (tlf) |
| Filing 5 "NOTICE of Complaint" by KENNETH CLAY (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlf). |
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to KENNETH CLAY (tlf). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hyles issued at the direction of the Court (tlf).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Filed by KENNETH CLAY.. Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(tlp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TOOMBS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, filed by KENNETH CLAY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
