DUNCAN v. SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA LLC
ADELA GARCIA DUNCAN |
SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA LLC |
4:2018cv00170 |
August 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
CLAY D LAND |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ADELA GARCIA DUNCAN (ROPER, JOHN) |
REMARK: In light of #6 Notice of Dismissal, this case has been closed (tlf). |
REMARK: Insofar as Local Rule 6.1 provides: " Any extensions of time within which to answer the complaint or an amended complaint by affirmative defenses or other defensive pleadings may be done by written, filed stipulations of counsel, not to exceed more than thirty (30) days from the original answer deadline without approval of the court. And, insofar as the requested extension does not exceed 30 days, #5 stipulation is being administratively processed without ruling by the court (tlf). |
Filing 5 STIPULATION For Extension of Time for Defendant to File Its Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint re #1 Complaint, by SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thomas, Gary) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA LLC ); Wrong event used - Pursuant to Local Rule 6.1 any extensions of time within which to answer the complaint or an amended complaint by affirmative defenses or other defensive pleadings may be done by written, filed stipulations of counsel, not to exceed more than thirty (30) days from the original answer deadline without approval of the court. Since this request does not exceed thirty (30) days, and is consented to by opposing counsel, defendant must file a Stipulation located under Other Filings - Other Documents - Stipulation. (ans) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA LLC filed by Gary E. Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thomas, Gary) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ADELA GARCIA DUNCAN as to SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA LLC. (ROPER, JOHN) |
Filing 2 Summons issued as to SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA, LLC (tlf). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA LLC Fee paid: Receipt # 113G-2957987, $400 filed by ADELA GARCIA DUNCAN (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Exhibit Duties of Position, #4 Exhibit Verification, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons)(ROPER, JOHN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DUNCAN v. SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ADELA GARCIA DUNCAN | |
Represented By: | JOHN W ROPER |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SAGAMOREHILL OF COLUMBUS GA LLC | |
Represented By: | Gary E. Thomas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.