NICHOLS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA et al
| SHANE NICHOLS |
| CHRISTOPHER CARR and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA |
| 4:2018cv00187 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER construing #1 Letter filed by SHANE NICHOLS as a motion for appointed counsel, denying said motion, directing the Clerk to mail Plaintiff a blank 2254 application form, and directing Plaintiff to fill out that form or notify the Court of his intention to proceed with a different claim within twenty-one (21) days. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 10-25-18. (bdd)
|
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to SHANE NICHOLS (tlp) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tlp)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by SHANE NICHOLS. (Attachments: #1 Account Certification, #2 Trust Fund Statement, #3 Test Scores). Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(tlp) |
| Filing 1 LETTER - COMPLAINT (IFP) against ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA, CHRISTOPHER CARR filed by SHANE NICHOLS (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
