HAMMONS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
YVONNE HAMMONS |
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) |
4:2018cv00225 |
November 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
STEPHEN HYLES |
CLAY D LAND |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (tlf). |
Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to YVONNE HAMMONS (tlf). |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hyles issued at the direction of the Court (tlf). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Fee paid: Receipt # 113G-3016956, $400 filed by Yvonne Hammons (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Appeals Council Denial, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney, #4 Summons Regional Chief Counsel, #5 Summons Attorney General)(BUDDE, FRANCIS) |
Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by YVONNE HAMMONS ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. NO NEED TO RE-FILE (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.