SMITH v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al.
Plaintiff: LEAKEASHA SMITH and LAKEASHA BROWN
Defendant: JOHN DOES and PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
Case Number: 4:2019cv00025
Filed: February 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: CLAY D LAND
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Class Action Complaint by PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC filed by NATASHA COOPER.(COOPER, NATASHA)
March 21, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC filed by NATASHA COOPER. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(COOPER, NATASHA)
March 21, 2019 REMARK: Insofar as Local Rule 6.1 provides: " Any extensions of time within which to answer the complaint or an amended complaint by affirmative defenses or other defensive pleadings may be done by written, filed stipulations of counsel, not to exceed more than thirty (30) days from the original answer deadline without approval of the court. And, insofar as the requested extension does not exceed 30 days, #6 motion for extension of time is being construed as such a stipulation and is being administratively terminated without ruling by the court (tlf).
March 20, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by LEAKEASHA SMITH as to PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC. (PAXTON, MISTY)
March 20, 2019 Filing 4 Replaced by D.E. #5 . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by LEAKEASHA SMITH (PAXTON, MISTY) Modified on 3/20/2019 (tlf).
March 20, 2019 Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #4 Certificate of Service filed by LEAKEASHA SMITH ); Document must be re-filed using correct event which is Civil Events, Initial Pleadings and Service, Service of Process, Summons Returned Executed (tlf).
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by YAAKOV SAKS (nop)
February 13, 2019 Filing 2 Summons issued as to PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC (tlf).
February 13, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC Fee paid: Receipt # 113G-3085728, $400 filed by LaKeasha Smith (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Proposed Summons)(PAXTON, MISTY)
February 13, 2019 NOTICE TO COUNSEL YAAKOV SAKS - Counsel is notified that they do not show in the court records that they meet the required attorney admissions policies of this court. If within 14 days of this notice all requirements, including the payment of Pro Hac Vice admissions fees, have not been met, a show cause hearing may be scheduled (tlf).
February 13, 2019 Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by LEAKEASHA SMITH; Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia; BAR NUMBERS. All counsel are required to designate their State Bar of Georgia Number on the signature page of each pleading filed; If exhibits are submitted as evidentiary materials for a document that is being filed, only those that are directly germane to the main document should be attached. Each exhibit must bea separate attachmentand must be labeled in the appropriate boxes within the ECF document upload screen with the available category type and a brief descriptionA generic identifier such as Exhibit A or Exhibit 1 is not acceptable. The description must be of sufficient detail to make the attachment readily identifiable to the court; Your contact information in CM/ECF is not current. Please login as soon as possible and update your user account via Utilities - Your Account. No need to re-file (tlf).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEAKEASHA SMITH
Represented By: YAAKOV SAKS
Represented By: MISTY OAKS PAXTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAKEASHA BROWN
Represented By: YAAKOV SAKS
Represented By: MISTY OAKS PAXTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
Represented By: NATASHA COOPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?