HAUF v. HAUF
Plaintiff: NATALYA VIKTOROVNA HAUF
Petitioner: MICHAEL J HAUF
Respondent: LEE R GROGAN, JR
Case Number: 4:2019cv00045
Filed: March 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: CLAY D LAND
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2019 Filing 21 JUDGMENT in favor of NATALYA VIKTOROVNA HAUF against MICHAEL J HAUF (ans)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Remand; granting #5 Motion for Attorney Fees; terminating #14 Motion for Sanctions; denying #18 Motion to Disqualify Judge. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 5/30/2019 (esl)
May 14, 2019 Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by LEE R GROGAN, JR re #18 MOTION to Disqualify Judge (Grogan, Lee)
May 9, 2019 Filing 18 MOTION to Disqualify Judge filed by MICHAEL J HAUF (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Affidavit - Petitioner, #3 Exhibit A - Recusal Order, with Envelope from Judge McBride, #4 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Petitioner)(tlf).
May 7, 2019 Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by MICHAEL J HAUF re #14 MOTION for Sanctions (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit A - Correspondence)(esl) Modified on 5/8/2019 (esl).
May 2, 2019 Filing 16 WITHDRAWAL of Motion #11 MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to Complaint filed by MICHAEL J HAUF (esl)
May 2, 2019 Filing 15 WITHDRAWAL of Motion #9 MOTION to Strike filed by MICHAEL J HAUF (esl)
April 30, 2019 Filing 14 MOTION for Sanctions by LEE R GROGAN, JR filed by Lee Roy Grogan, Jr.(Grogan, Lee)
April 22, 2019 Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by LEE R GROGAN, JR re #9 MOTION to Strike (Grogan, Lee)
April 22, 2019 Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by LEE R GROGAN, JR re #11 MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to Complaint (Grogan, Lee)
April 22, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to Complaint filed by MICHAEL J. HAUF(tlf).
April 18, 2019 Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by LEE R GROGAN, JR re #8 MOTION to Strike #5 MOTION to Remand MOTION for Attorney Fees (Grogan, Lee)
April 17, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Strike by MICHAEL J HAUF.(tlp)
April 15, 2019 Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #8 Motion to Strike filed by MICHAEL J HAUF; Petitioner attached a copy of a motion to remand filed by respondent to his motion to strike. The CM/ECF procedures manual provides as follows: "Exhibits. Participants shall not attach as an exhibit any pleading or other paper already on file with the Court in the case, but may only refer to the document or document number." (tlf).
April 11, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Strike #5 MOTION to Remand MOTION for Attorney Fees Filed by MICHAEL J HAUF. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Copy of Motion to Remand)(esl)
April 8, 2019 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by LEE R GROGAN, JR.(Grogan, Lee)
April 1, 2019 Filing 6 AMENDED DOCUMENT by MICHAEL J HAUF amending #1 Notice of Removal and #2 Amended Document (Attachments: #1 Exhibit K - State Court Response to Motion to Dismiss Appeal)(tlf).
March 29, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Remand , MOTION for Attorney Fees by LEE R GROGAN, JR filed by Lee Roy Grogan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Attorney Fees Affidavit, #2 State Court Divorce Initial Pleadings and Orders)(Grogan, Lee)
March 28, 2019 Filing 4 Document is not an amended motion, but rather an amended certificate of service. FIRST AMENDED MOTION Amending #3 MOTION to Remand by LEE R GROGAN, JR filed by Lee Roy Grogan, Jr.(Grogan, Lee) Modified on 3/28/2019 (tlf).
March 28, 2019 Filing 3 Replaced by D.E #5 . MOTION to Remand by LEE R GROGAN, JR filed by Lee Roy Grogan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Lee Grogan Jr. - Attorney Fees, #2 Complaint - Answer and Counterclaim - Orders - Hauf State Court Divorce)(Grogan, Lee) Modified on 3/28/2019 (tlf).
March 28, 2019 Filing 2 AMENDED DOCUMENT by MICHAEL J HAUF amending #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I - 86-Paged General Affidavit, #2 Exhibit J - 26 Paged General Affidavit)(tlf).
March 28, 2019 Notice of Deficiency; Document must be re-filed; Related document: #3 Motion to Remand filed by LEE R. GROGAN JR.; Motions with Multiple Reliefs Requested. Motion contained multiple reliefs (e.g., to remand and for attorney fees), yet only one was selected. The Cm/ECC procedures manual provides as follows: "When a motion requests multiple or alternative reliefs, it is especially important to select multiple reliefs when filing. For instance, with a combined motion to dismiss and motion to strike, you must select both reliefs to dismiss' and 'to strike. You do this by clicking on each motion relief from the drop down menu. You cannot select only the motion to dismiss and then type in the text box and motion to strike". It is imperative that all relief categories are specifically selected. The Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system will then track each relief as a separate request for action. This helps the court ensure that all matters are properly addressed. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in a request for relief that is not tracked on the pending motion reports used in case management.. Additionally, all documents must be text-searchable. The CM/ECF procedures manual further provides: " Preparing Documents for Electronic Filing: Documents in their native format such as Word or WordPerfect must be converted into text-searchable PDF before filing. Most word processing applications allow publishing or converting to PDF within the application. There are also commercial and free PDF converters available for use. Participants must not print and scan electronic documents for submission into CM/ECF. Documents must not be scanned prior to e-filing unless the original documents are unavailable in electronic format or require original signature. " Document must be re-filed (tlf).
March 18, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MICHAEL J. HAUF from Superior Court of Talbot County, case number 2015-cv-21, consisting of Various state court pleadings regarding a motion for sanctions and motion to dismiss, and various correspondence and affidavits regarding encounters by petitioner with postal of Superior Court clerk personnel. Filing fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 42162 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Brief for Motion for Sanctions, #3 Exhibit B - Letter from Mr. Grogan to Judge Rumer, #4 Exhibit C - Correspondence mto Talbot County Superior Court Clerk, #5 Exhibit D - Affidavit re: Encounter with Post Office, #6 Exhibit E - Affidavit re: Encounter at Clerk of Talbot Superior Court's Office, #7 Exhibit F - Affifavit re: Encounter with Ms. Mahone (Although the documents states it is 50 pages, it was only 49 pages), #8 Exhibit G - Letter from Petitioner to Judge Rumer, #9 Exhibit H - Memorandum by Petitioner filed in Superior Court)(tlf).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HAUF v. HAUF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MICHAEL J HAUF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NATALYA VIKTOROVNA HAUF
Represented By: Lee Roy Grogan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: LEE R GROGAN, JR
Represented By: Lee Roy Grogan, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?