BUCKLEY v. ESPER
Plaintiff: ERIKA BUCKLEY
Defendant: MARK T. ESPER and MARK T ESPER
Case Number: 4:2019cv00049
Filed: March 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: CLAY D LAND
Referring Judge: MARC THOMAS TREADWELL
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint re #1 Complaint : by MARK T ESPER filed by BOWEN REICHERT SHOEMAKER.(SHOEMAKER, BOWEN)
June 27, 2019 Filing 5 STIPULATION Regarding Time to Respond to Complaint by MARK T ESPER (SHOEMAKER, BOWEN)
June 10, 2019 REMARK: Insofar as Local Rule 6.1 provides: " Any extensions of time within which to answer the complaint or an amended complaint by affirmative defenses or other defensive pleadings may be done by written, filed stipulations of counsel, not to exceed more than thirty (30) days from the original answer deadline without approval of the court. And, insofar as the requested extension does not exceed 30 days, #4 motion for extension of time is being construed as such a stipulation and is being administratively terminated without ruling by the Court (tlf).
June 7, 2019 Filing 4 JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by MARK T ESPER filed by BOWEN REICHERT SHOEMAKER. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion)(SHOEMAKER, BOWEN)
March 25, 2019 Filing 3 Summons issued as to MARK T. ESPER (tlf).
March 25, 2019 Case REASSIGNED to US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D. LAND. US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL no longer assigned to the case (tlf).
March 25, 2019 Notice of Deficiency; Related document(s): #1 Complaint filed by ERIKA BUCKLEY; Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. No need to re-file(tlf),
March 22, 2019 Filing 2 This is a text only entry; no document issued.CASE TRANSFERRED TO Columbus Division Pursuant to Local Rule 3.4 Statement. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/22/2019. (ggs)
March 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARK T. ESPER Fee paid: Receipt # 113G-3112491, $400 filed by ERIKA BUCKLEY (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Burke, E.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BUCKLEY v. ESPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERIKA BUCKLEY
Represented By: E EARLE BURKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK T. ESPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK T ESPER
Represented By: BOWEN REICHERT SHOEMAKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?