DIPIETRO v. LOCKHART et al
| ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO |
| FARMER, SHANEQUA MUSSA, LOCKHART, HAZEL VAUGHN and SHARON LEWIS |
| 4:2020cv00035 |
| February 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Filed by ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlf)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is Ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $23.20. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 4-13-20. (rcg)
|
|
Filing 5
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO as to #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (tlf).
|
|
Filing 4
Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO (tlf).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hyles issued at the direction of the Court (tlf).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO. Motion referred to US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES (tlf).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO against, SHARON LEWIS, FARMER, LOCKHART, SHANEQUA MUSSA, and HAZEL VAUGHN (tlf).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
