ALSHAER v. BARR et al
| IBRAHIM ALSHAER |
| RONALD D VITIELLO, MICHAEL J DONAHUE, WILLIAM BARR and KEVIN K MACALEENAN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
| 4:2020cv00069 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER setting briefing schedule. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 4-22-20. (rcg)
|
| Filing 5 RETURN RESPONSE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by WILLIAM BARR, MICHAEL J DONAHUE, KEVIN K MACALEENAN, RONALD D VITIELLO (SIMON, LANCE) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Respondents to File Responsive Pleading re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 4-9-20. (rcg)
|
| Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to IBRAHIM ALSHAER (esl) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 4/9/2020. (esl)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUSagainst WILLIAM BARR, MICHAEL J DONAHUE, KEVIN K MACALEENAN, RONALD D VITIELLO filed by IBRAHIM ALSHAER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit citizenship documents, #2 payment receipt, #3 Envelope)(esl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
