DAVIS v. HOSTESS BRANDS LLC et al
| RUSS DAVIS |
| SCOTT HICKS and HOSTESS BRANDS LLC |
| 4:2020cv00214 |
| September 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend the Deadline for Defendant Scott Hicks to Answer, Move, Or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by SCOTT HICKS (STAPLETON, JOHN) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RUSS DAVIS. as to HOSTESS BRANDS LLC (ROPER, JOHN) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RUSS DAVIS as to SCOTT HICKS. (ROPER, JOHN) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Substitution of Document by RUSS DAVIS re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Verification)(ROPER, JOHN) |
| Filing 3 Summons issued as to HOSTESS BRANDS, LLC (tlf). |
| Filing 2 Summons issued as to SCOTT HICKS (tlf). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3561903, $400 filed by RUSS DAVIS (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Verification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(ROPER, JOHN) |
| Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #1 Complaint filed by RUSS DAVIS; The document attached as an exhibit does not appear to be the verification identified in the complaint. Filer should create and file a notice, and attach the correct document (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
