STARZETSKI et al v. SATA GMBH & CO KG et al
| JENNIFER STARZETSKI and JEVIN STARZETSKI |
| DAN-AM COMPANY, SATA GMBH & CO. KG, FINISHMASTER, INC., FINISHMASTER INC, DANAM COMPANY and SATA GMBH & CO KG |
| 4:2021cv00008 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1391 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by THOMAS J GALLIGAN (nop)
|
| Filing 15 PETITION TO THE CLERK FOR ADMISSION TO PLEAD AND PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE by THOMAS J. GALLIGAN for DANAM COMPANY. Attorney Admission Fee (Pro Hac Vice) paid by Receipt # AGAMDC-3736854, $100. LOCAL COUNSEL Name and Georgia Bar #: FREDERICK N SAGER, Jr., Bar # 622070. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(GALLIGAN, THOMAS) Modified on 3/10/2021 (tlp) - for clarification |
| Notice of Deficiency as to #15 Petition to the Clerk for Admission to Plead and Practice Pro Hac Vice. Documents are to be converted into text-searchable PDF format before e-filing; therefore, in the future, please verify documents meet this requirement before filing. No need to refile #15 Petition. Thank you. (tlp) |
|
Filing 14
Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by ARND N VON WALDOW (nop)
|
| Filing 13 Jurisdictional Statement by DANAM COMPANY (SAGER, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DANAM COMPANY (SAGER, FREDERICK) |
| Filing 11 PETITION TO THE CLERK FOR ADMISSION TO PLEAD AND PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE by DANAM COMPANY Attorney ARND VON WALDOW. Admission Fee (Pro Hac Vice) paid by Receipt # AGAMDC-3719110, $100. LOCAL COUNSEL Fredercik N. Sager Jr. 622070. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(VON WALDOW, ARND) Modified on 2/23/2021 (tlp) - to clarify. |
| Filing 10 Georgia Attorney Admission Fee Met by JOSHUA A ROMAN (nop) |
| Notice of Deficiency to Counsel B KOWALZYK. It appears the phone number in the CM/ECF database is not included on the pleadings - #8 Corporate Disclosure Statement or #9 Jurisdictional Statement. For future filings, please make sure all contact information is included on documents and up-to-date in CM/ECF. Thank you.(tlp) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL JOSHUA A ROMAN - Counsel is notified that they do not show in the court records that they meet the required attorney admissions policies of this court. If within 14 days of this notice all requirements, including the payment of admissions fees, have not been met, a show cause hearing will be scheduled.(tlp) |
| Notice of Deficiency to Counsel F. SAGER JR and J ROMAN. Contact information on #7 Answer to Complaint appears to have an incomplete address. Please review future documents for complete and accurate contact information before filing. (tlp) |
| Filing 9 Jurisdictional Statement by FINISHMASTER INC (NORTH, RICHARD) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FINISHMASTER INC identifying Corporate Parent UNI-SELECT INC for FINISHMASTER INC. (NORTH, RICHARD) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by DANAM COMPANY with Jury Demand.(SAGER, FREDERICK)Attorney FREDERICK N SAGER, Jr added to party DANAM COMPANY(pty:dft) |
| Notice of Deficiency to Counsel RICHARD B NORTH as to #6 Answer to Complaint. Please immediately review contact information in CM/ECF, specifically phone numbers, and update via PACER. Phone number(s) on pleading and in CM/ECF do not match. (tlp) |
| Notice of Deficiency as to Counsel RICHARD B NORTH and BRANDEE J KOWALZYK as to #6 Answer to Complaint filed by FINISHMASTER INC. Pursuant to Local Rule 87.1, all nongovernmental corporate parties must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement, and pursuant to Local Rule 87.2 a Jurisdictional Statement must also be filed. (tlp) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by FINISHMASTER INC with Jury Demand.(NORTH, RICHARD)Attorney RICHARD B NORTH, JR added to party FINISHMASTER INC(pty:dft) |
| Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted by JEVIN STARZETSKI, JENNIFER STARZETSKI as to SATA GMBH & CO KG. (CRAWFORD, JASON) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JEVIN STARZETSKI, JENNIFER STARZETSKI as to DANAM COMPANY. (CRAWFORD, JASON) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Plaintiffs as to FINISHMASTER INC. (CRAWFORD, JASON) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as ALL DEFENDANTS: SATA GMBH &CO KG, DANAM COMPANY, and FINISHMASTER INC (Attachments: #1 Summons - DANAM, #2 Summons - FINISHMASTER INC)(tlp) |
| Notice of Deficiency to Counsel JASON CRAWFORD as to #1 Complaint. Punctuation, such as periods and commas, was used in party names which is not permitted. Please see the STYLE GUIDE which is located on our website: https://www.gamd.uscourts.gov/cmecf. Also, the cause of action on the civil cover sheet and the complaint did not match. All corrections have been made and no action required. (tlp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3682259, $402 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Air Regulator Product Description, #2 Exhibit B-Photo-SATA/Dan-Am filter with end cap, #3 Exhibit C-Photo-Damaged End Cap, #4 Exhibit D-Recall Notice, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons Summons-SATA GMBH & CO. KG, #7 Summons Summons-DAN-AM COMPANY, #8 Summons Summons-FINISHMASTER, INC.)(CRAWFORD, JASON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
