BREWSTER v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
| GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III |
| DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, JOSE GUZMAN, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and Judge SMITH |
| 4:2021cv00019 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Consent to proceed before a full-time U.S. Magistrate Judge in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in 28 U.S.C 636(c)(1) and (2), DEMAND for Trial by Jury by GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(esl) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint, against DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, JOSE GUZMAN, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SMITH by GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(esl) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Envelope). Motion referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(esl) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (esl)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, JOSE GUZMAN, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SMITH filed by GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Georgia Code and right to speedy trial research, #2 Envelope)(esl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
