BICKERSTAFF v. BICKERSTAFF
SARAH WALDEN BICKERSTAFF |
WALKER REYNOLDS BICKERSTAFF |
4:2021cv00051 |
April 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
CLAY D LAND |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 2511 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 REPLY to Response filed by WALKER REYNOLDS BICKERSTAFF re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (MULLIN, C) |
Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #6 Response to Motion filed by SARAH WALDEN BICKERSTAFF; Notice to Counsel: Mandi Moroz. This document did not include your e mail address as required by F.R.Civ.P. 11 Additionally the e mail address in CM/ECF displays the e mail of your co-counsel, Mr. Droze. Please update your e mail address via PACER (tlf). |
Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #6 Response to Motion filed by SARAH WALDEN BICKERSTAFF; Notice to Counsel: William Droze. Your email address in CM/ECF does not match the e mail which appeared on this pleading. If necessry, please update your e mail address via PACER (tlf). |
Filing 6 RESPONSE filed by SARAH WALDEN BICKERSTAFF re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Droze, William) |
Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by WALKER REYNOLDS BICKERSTAFF filed by C MORRIS MULLIN. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Petition for Divorce, #3 Exhibit B - Answer and Counterclaim, #4 Exhibit C - Declaration of C. Morris Mullin)(MULLIN, C) |
Georgia Attorney Admission Fee Met by William Middleton Droze on 1/10/1989. Disregard the Notice to Counsel re: admission requirements. (nop) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SARAH WALDEN BICKERSTAFF as to WALKER REYNOLDS BICKERSTAFF. (Droze, William) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to WALKER REYNOLDS BICKERSTAFF. (tlp) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SARAH WALDEN BICKERSTAFF (Droze, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WALKER REYNOLDS BICKERSTAFF Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3764374, $402 filed by SARAH WALDEN BICKERSTAFF (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Droze, William) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL William Middleton Droze - Counsel is notified that they do not show in the court records that they meet the required attorney admissions policies of this court. If within 14 days of this notice all requirements, including the payment of admissions fees, have not been met, a show cause hearing will be scheduled.(tlp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BICKERSTAFF v. BICKERSTAFF | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: WALKER REYNOLDS BICKERSTAFF | |
Represented By: | DAVID R HELMICK |
Represented By: | C MORRIS MULLIN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SARAH WALDEN BICKERSTAFF | |
Represented By: | William Middleton Droze |
Represented By: | MANDI R MOROZ |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.