ROSE v. COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE
| UMI ROSE and MELINDA DECOSTE |
| COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC and COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE |
| 4:2021cv00105 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by UMI ROSE. as to COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE (EDMONDS, ANGELIK) |
| Filing 11 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #9 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney CARTER P SCHONDELMAYER terminated. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 7/22/2021 (amr) |
| Filing 10 Summons issued as to COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE (tlf). |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC filed by CARTER P SCHONDELMAYER.(SCHONDELMAYER, CARTER) |
| Filing 8 Replaced by D.E. #9 . MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC filed by CARTER P SCHONDELMAYER.(SCHONDELMAYER, CARTER) Modified on 7/21/2021 (tlf). |
| Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #8 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney filed by COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC; Certificate of Service indicated Mr. McKoon was served via CM/ECF/ However, Mr. McKoon has not entered an appearance and must be served outside of CM/ECF with a certificate of service indicating said service (tlf). |
| Filing 7 AMENDED #1 Complaint, against COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE by UMI ROSE (EDMONDS, ANGELIK) |
| Filing 6 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting in part and denying in part #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have through August 2, 2021 to file its answer and/or responsive pleadings. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 7/16/2021 (amr) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC filed by CARTER P SCHONDELMAYER. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Brief in Support of Motion For Extension of Time to Answer Complaint)(SCHONDELMAYER, CARTER) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by UMI ROSE as to COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC. (EDMONDS, ANGELIK) |
| Filing 3 Replaced by D.E. #4 . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by UMI ROSE (EDMONDS, ANGELIK) Modified on 7/9/2021 (tlf). |
| Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #3 Certificate of Service filed by UMI ROSE; Document must be re-filed using correct event which is Civil Events, Initial Pleadings and Service, Service of Process, Summons Returned Executed (tlf). |
| Filing 2 Summons issued as to COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION, INC. (tlf). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Columbus Technical College Foundation Inc. Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3826871, $402 filed by Umi Rose (Attachments: #1 Summons SUMMONS OF DEFENDANT, #2 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET)(EDMONDS, ANGELIK) |
| Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by UMI ROSE; Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. No need to re-file corrected by case manager (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
