CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
| CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN |
| T-MOBILE, SOUTHEASTERN STAGES INC, O'REILLY AUTO PARTS and BANK OF AMERICA |
| 4:2022cv00110 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 9-6-22. (jdl) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN. (Attachments: #1 statement)(esl) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned - (4 in 4:22-cv-00110-CDL) Order to Show Cause, (4 in 4:22-cv-00112-CDL) Order to Show Cause sent to plaintiff returned as undeliverable. (tlf) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 8-22-22. (jdl)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER to recast motion to proceed IFP. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 7-26-22. (jdl) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/26/2022) (esl).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN. (Attachments: #1 supporting documents)(esl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by CHRISTOPHER S. RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN against All Defendants (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
