CDN INNOVATIONS LLC v. MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
| CDN INNOVATIONS LLC |
| MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION |
| 4:2022cv00138 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by YUSUF ESAT (nop)
|
|
Filing 12
Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by AMR O ALY (nop)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by CDN INNOVATIONS LLC re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint re #1 Complaint,,,,, : (Attachments: #1 Declaration of James Lennon, #2 Exhibit 1 - Map Showing Directions from Mediacom to District of Delaware, #3 Exhibit 2. - Mediacom Communications Reports Combined Results for Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019, #4 Exhibit 3 - Mediacom 10-k for 2018, #5 Exhibit 4 - Mediacom Wikipedia page)(KENT, DANIEL) |
| Filing 10 PETITION TO THE CLERK FOR ADMISSION TO PLEAD AND PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE by MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Attorney Admission Fee (Pro Hac Vice) paid by Receipt # AGAMDC-4222340, $100. LOCAL COUNSEL Name and Georgia Bar #: Coby S. Nixon - 545005; Seth K. Trimble - 851055. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(ESAT, YUSUF) |
| Filing 9 PETITION TO THE CLERK FOR ADMISSION TO PLEAD AND PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE by MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Attorney Admission Fee (Pro Hac Vice) paid by Receipt # AGAMDC-4222266, $100. LOCAL COUNSEL Name and Georgia Bar #: Coby S. Nixon - 545005; Seth K. Trimble - 851055.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(ALY, AMR) |
| Filing 8 RULES 16/26 ORDER:Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 11/28/2022. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 10/17/2022. (tlp) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #7 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, #6 Motion to Dismiss Complaint, filed by MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION ); The signature block does not include the bar numbers of the attorneys listed. Please do not re-file, for future reference only. See Administrative Procedures Page 7.(ggs) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION identifying Corporate Parent JMCC CORPORATION for MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION. (TRIMBLE, SETH) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint re #1 Complaint,,,,, : by MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION filed by SETH KINCAID TRIMBLE. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A - 2022.08.02 CDN Letter to Mediacom, #3 Exhibit B - 2022.09.09 Complaint 22-1193 (DED))(TRIMBLE, SETH) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CDN INNOVATIONS LLC as to MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION. (KENT, DANIEL) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CDN INNOVATIONS LLC as to MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION. (KENT, DANIEL) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION. (esl) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CDN INNOVATIONS, LLC identifying Corporate Parent BRAINBOX INNOVATIONS LLC for CDN INNOVATIONS, LLC. (KENT, DANIEL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4181623, $402 filed by CDN INNOVATIONS, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Pat No 6,311,180, #2 Exhibit B - US Pat No 6,865,532, #3 Exhibit C - US Pat No 7,130,831, #4 Exhibit D - US Pat No 7,225,157, #5 Exhibit E - US Pat No 8,024,227, #6 Exhibit F - US Pat No 8,868,450, #7 Exhibit G - US Pat No 7,164,714, #8 Exhibit H - US Pat No 7,293,291, #9 Exhibit I - US Pat No 7,565,699, #10 Exhibit J - '180 Infringement Claim Chart, #11 Exhibit K - '532 Infringement Claim Chart, #12 Exhibit L - '831 Infringement Claim Chart, #13 Exhibit M - '157 Infringement Claim Chart, #14 Exhibit N - '227 Infringement Claim Chart, #15 Exhibit O - '450 Infringement Claim Chart, #16 Exhibit P - '714 Infringement Claim Chart, #17 Exhibit Q - '291 Infringement Claim Chart, #18 Exhibit R - '699 Infringement Claim Chart, #19 Exhibit S - Declaration of Dr. Robert Akl, D.SC., #20 Civil Cover Sheet, #21 Summons Proposed Summons to Mediacom Communications Corporation, #22 Form AO120 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark)(KENT, DANIEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CDN INNOVATIONS LLC v. MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CDN INNOVATIONS LLC | |
| Represented By: | DANIEL A KENT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | COBY S NIXON |
| Represented By: | AMR O ALY |
| Represented By: | SETH KINCAID TRIMBLE |
| Represented By: | YUSUF ESAT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
