BAYO v. WASHBURN
| MOUSTAPHA BAYO |
| MERRICK B GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TAE D JOHNSON, JARVIS MCMILLAR and Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
| 4:2022cv00177 |
| November 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 11/17/22. (mjm)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hyles issued at the direction of the Court (tlf).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Respondent to File Responsive Pleading re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MOUSTAPHA BAYO. The Clerk is directed to amend the docket to reflect Russell Washburn, Warden of Stewart Detention Center, as the Respondent. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 11/17/22. (mjm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by MOUSTAPHA BAYO, included within #1 petition. Motion referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES (tlf). |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by MOUSTAPHA BAYO. Filing fee $ 5.00, Receipt number 42988. Petition includes a request for appointment of counsel (Attachments: #1 Immigration Documents, #2 Envelope) (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
