RANSOM v. JOHNSON
KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM, SR |
VICKI JOHNSON, VICKI JAMESON and PAMELA JACKSON |
4:2023cv00040 |
March 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
STEPHEN HYLES |
CLAY D LAND |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM, SR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(esl) |
Filing 5 RECAST #1 Complaint against VICKI JOHNSON, VICKI JAMESON, PAMELA JACKSON by KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM, SR (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(esl) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #3 MOTION Tax Exemption Status. ORDER to Recast Complaint using required 42 U.S.C. 1983 form. ORDER to pay filing fee or submit motion to proceed IFP. The Clerk is directed to provide Plaintiff with the appropriate forms. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 3-22-23. (jdl) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Tax Exemption Status Filed by KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM, SR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(esl) |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hyles issued at the direction of the Court (tlf). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by KELVIN CHARLES RANSOM SR against VICKI JOHNSON (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.