VANNESS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
| KEVIN VANNESS |
| MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL and MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE |
| 4:2023cv00129 |
| July 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 8/21/2023. (mlb)
|
|
Filing 5
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by KEVIN VANNESS (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (tlf).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER to Amend/Supplement Complaint and pay the filing fee or submit a complete and proper motion to proceed IFP, which should include a certified copy of Plaintiff's trust fund account statement. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 7/31/23. (mjm)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by KEVIN VANNESS. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Account Certification - Incomplete - Unsigned). Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(tlp)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tlp)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE - filed by KEVIN VANNESS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
