TERRY v. THOMPSON et al
| KEITH TERRY |
| MARIO JERMAINE THOMPSON, GFA ALABAMA INC and ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 4:2023cv00172 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY ORDER:Discovery to be complete by 4/5/2024. Dispositive motions due by 5/20/2024. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 10/23/2023. (esl) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal,,,, by ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, GFA ALABAMA INC, MARIO JERMAINE THOMPSON.(DOVE, TAYLOR) |
| Filing 7 RULES 16/26 ORDER:Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 11/15/2023. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 10/4/2023. (esl) |
| Filing 6 Jurisdictional Statement by GFA ALABAMA INC (DOVE, TAYLOR) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GFA ALABAMA INC identifying Other Affiliate STEVE HONG for GFA ALABAMA INC. (DOVE, TAYLOR) |
| Filing 4 Jurisdictional Statement by ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY (DOVE, TAYLOR) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Corporate Parent ARGO GROUP US INC for ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY. (DOVE, TAYLOR) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Certification of Notification to State Court of Removal by ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, GFA ALABAMA, INC., MARIO JERMAINE THOMPSON re #1 Notice of Removal,,,, (Attachments: #1 Removal Documents Notice of Removal to State Court Clerk, #2 Removal Documents Notice of Removal to State Court Judges)(DOVE, TAYLOR) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against KEITH TERRY Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4473545, $402 filed by All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Executed Declaration of Mario J. Thompson, #2 Exhibit State Court Pleadings, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Removal Documents Notice to Attorneys of Removal, #5 Removal Documents Defendant Argonaut Insurance Company's Corporate Disclosure Statement, #6 Removal Documents Defendant GFA Alabama, Inc.'s Corporate Disclosure Statement, #7 Removal Documents Defendant Argonaut Insurance Company's Local Rule 87.2 Jurisdictional Statement, #8 Removal Documents Defendant GFA Alabama Inc.'s Local Rule 87.2 Jurisdictional Statement, #9 Removal Documents Statement Enumerating Motions Pending in Case Within State Court at Time of Removal) All parties must refile pending motions from the court of origin in this new case.(DOVE, TAYLOR) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document: #1 Notice of Removal filed by ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, MARIO JERMAINE THOMPSON, GFA ALABAMA INC ); The Corporate Disclosure Statements were erroneously attached to the Notice of Removal and must be re-filed. The Corporate Disclosure Statements for each defendant should be filed separately and any corporate parents, subsidiary corporations and/or any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock to the case must be added within CM/ECF while the document is being filed. All nongovernmental corporate parties must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement. Please file the required corporate disclosures immediately. See Local Rule 87.1 In diversity cases, a Jurisdictional Statement must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties. Please re-file the required statements for each corporate defendant immediately as these were also erroneously attached to the Notice of Removal. See Local Rule 87.2.(esl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
