CHAUDHARI v. GARLAND et al
| RAMANBHAI MADHABHAI CHAUDHARI |
| MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL M RENAUD and TRACY RENAUD |
| 4:2023cv00197 |
| December 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter regarding acceptance of service from UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - CIVIL PROCESS CLERK. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sst) |
| Filing 4 Letter from AUSA regarding insufficiency of service (tlf). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL M RENAUD, TRACY RENAUD, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons Mayorkas, #2 Summons D. Renaud, #3 Summons T. Renaud, #4 Summons AUSA)(esl) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (esl)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4518037, $405 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #2 Summons A. MAYORKAS SUMMONS, #3 Summons D. RENAUD SUMMONS, #4 Summons M. GARLAND SUMMONS, #5 Summons T. RENAUD SUMMONS, #6 Summons ATTORNEY SUMMONS, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT A- I-918 RECEIPT, #8 Exhibit EXHIBIT B- POLICY GUIDANCE, #9 Exhibit EXHIBIT C- I-765 RECEIPT, #10 Exhibit EXHIBIT D- BIOMETRICS)(CHAUDHARY, BHAVYA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
