CHAUDHARI et al v. MAYORKAS et al
| YOGESHKUMAR AMBALAL CHAUDHARI and RITABEN AMRUTBHAI CHAUDHARI |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND, DANIEL RENAUD and TRACY RENAUD |
| 4:2023cv00199 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tlp)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL RENAUD, TRACY RENAUD, U.S. Attorney (Attachments: #1 Summons - Merrick Garland, #2 Summons - Tracy Renaud, #3 Summons - Daniel Renaud, #4 Summons - U. S. Attorney)(tlp) (Attachment 4 replaced on 12/11/2023) (tlp). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4519886, $405 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons for Alejandro Mayorkas, #3 Summons Summons for Daniel Renaud, #4 Summons Summons for Merrick Garland, #5 Summons Summons for Tracy Renaud, #6 Summons Summons for U.S. District Attorney MDGA, #7 Exhibit I918 Receipt Notice, #8 Exhibit I918A Receipt Notice, #9 Exhibit USCIS Policy Memo, #10 Exhibit I765 Receipt Notice, #11 Exhibit Biometrics Notice)(CHAUDHARY, BHAVYA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
