VANNESS v. COPPERHEAD BAIL BONDING COMPANY
| KEVIS VANNESS and KEVIS VAN NESS |
| COPPERHEAD BAIL BONDING COMPANY |
| 4:2024cv00007 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of proposed summons (which was not issued) by KEVIS VAN NESS (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tlf). |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by KEVIS VAN NESS. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 1/31/2024. (mlb) |
| Initial partial filing fee of $11.67 paid. Receipt number 43247 (tlf). |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is Ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $11.67. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 1/19/2024. (mlb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hyles issued at the direction of the Court (tlf).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by KEVIS VANNESS (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Southern District IFP). Motion referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES (tlf). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by KEVIS VANNESS against COPPERHEAD BAIL BONDING COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Southern District form (there was no page 2 attached), #2 Envelope) (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
