VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
| KEVIS VAN NESS |
| Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, Lieutenant HARBERT, Sgt MARTIN, Deputy HANCOCK and Captain TROMBLEY |
| 4:2024cv00032 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Letter from Muscogee County Sheriff's Office regarding insufficient funds re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (esl) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Filed by KEVIS VAN NESS. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Envelope). Motion referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(esl) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is Ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $17.50. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 3-19-24. (jdl)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tlp)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Filed by KEVIS VAN NESS. (Attachments: #1 Account Certification). Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(tlp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, HANCOCK, HARBERT, MARTIN, TROMBLEY - filed by KEVIS VAN NESS (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Envelope)(tlp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
