LEMONS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
JENNIFER A LEMONS |
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE) |
4:2024cv00035 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
STEPHEN HYLES |
CLAY D LAND |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 3/19/2024. (mlb) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to JENNIFER A. LEMONS (tlf). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JENNIFER A LEMONS filed by JOHN V HOGAN. (Attachments: #1 Application to File IFP, # 2 LR 9.2 form). Motion(s) referred to STEPHEN HYLES.(HOGAN, JOHN) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP) against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY filed by JENNIFER A LEMONS (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(HOGAN, JOHN) |
Notice of Deficiency; Related document: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JENNIFER A LEMONS; The local Rule 9/2 certificate must be filed separately as Civil Events, Other Filings, Other Documents, Local Rule 9.2 Social Security Identification Form (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.