TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
| READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER |
| MARK HARRIS, ALETHEA HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, NIKKI WATKINS and NATAKI WALKERS |
| 4:2024cv00069 |
| May 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| CLAY D LAND |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is ORDERED and DIRECTED to provide to the Clerk of Court the physical address for each Defendant in this matter WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date of this Order. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 5/14/2024. (mlb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER. Motion referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES (tlf). |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES for ruling on IFP and a frivolity screen issued at the direction of the Court (tlf).
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER against DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ALETHEA HARRIS, MARK HARRIS, NIKKI WATKINS, and NATAKI WALKERS (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit - Military and State Court Records) (tlf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
