Sims v. Morton
Petitioner: Kalvin Sims
Respondent: Calvin Morton
Case Number: 5:2007cv00112
Filed: March 26, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Houston
Presiding Judge: Claude W. Hicks
Presiding Judge: Maryland Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 3/9/10 (dcp)
February 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kalvin Sims. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 2/18/10. (CWH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sims v. Morton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kalvin Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Calvin Morton
Represented By: Robin Joy Leigh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?