Forman v. Terry et al
| Edward Forman |
| William Terry, John Hill, Mr. Hagan, George Ivey and Gail Spikes |
| 5:2008cv00007 |
| January 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Macon |
| Claude W. Hicks |
| Hugh Lawson |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss; denying 40 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 40 Motion for TRO; denying 47 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 47 Motion for Protective Order; denying 48 Amended Motion; adopting Report and Recommendations re 56 Report and Recommendations; adopting Report and Recommendations re 57 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/30/2009. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to deny 40 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction/MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Edward Forman; 47 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction/MOTION for Protective Order filed by Edward Forman; and 48 AMENDED MOTION Amending 47 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction/MOTION for Protective Order filed by Edward Forman. Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2009. Order denying 39 motion seeking to amend re 40 . Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 3/5/09. (CWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
