Williams v. Bradley et al
| DWayne Eddie Williams |
| Dr. Bradley, Ann Baxter and Charles Roper |
| 5:2008cv00209 |
| June 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition Office |
| Jasper |
| Claude W. Hicks, Jr. |
| Hugh Lawson |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER denying 99 Motion to Consider. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 1/4/2011. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER denying 83 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 85 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/30/2010. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER denying 68 Motion to Vacate ; denying 74 Motion to Vacate ; denying 77 Motion to Vacate. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 7/2/2009. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 51 Report and Recommendations; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; granting 20 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 3/24/2009. (nbp)
|
|
Filing
51
RECOMMENDATION to grant 16 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Charles Roper and Ann Baxter and to grant 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Dr. Bradley. Objections to R&R due by 1/23/2009. Also, ORDER denying 45 plaintiff's Motion for Witness. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 1/6/09. (CWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
