Eshena v. Frazier et al
| Anthony Michael Eshena |
| David Frazier, Betty L. McGrew, Captain Ransom, Officer Dixon, Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, Jane Doe No. 3, Carl Lift and Mr. Butts |
| 5:2008cv00417 |
| December 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition Office |
| Hancock |
| Claude W. Hicks, Jr. |
| C. Ashley Royal |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 43 Report and Recommendations and granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 3/26/10 (lap)
|
|
Filing
43
RECOMMENDATION to grant 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Ransom, Betty L. McGrew, Officer Shandria Dixon, David Butts, David Frazier, and Carl Lift. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 2/25/10. (CWH)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 10 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims against the Jane Doe defendants are Dismissed. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 10/14/09 (lap)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Anthony Michael Eshena. Service ordered on all defendants except Jane Doe defendants, with instructions to the parties. Recommendation to dismiss Jane Doe defendants. Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2009. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 2/4/09. (CWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
