Lawson v. Wells et al
Melissa Lawson |
James Wells, Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, First Guard Insurance Company and Lincoln General Insurance Company |
5:2009cv00155 |
April 22, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Houston |
Hugh Lawson |
Defendant |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 ORDER of settlement. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 11/29/2010. (nbp) |
Filing 75 ORDER finding as moot 37 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 39 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 68 Motion to Strike ; granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion to Exlude Demonstrative Evident Used During Deposition. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 11/17/2010. (nbp) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Limited Continuance. No other continuances will be granted. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 8/18/2010. (nbp) |
Filing 24 ORDER finding as moot 18 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and dismissing Plaintiff's claims for attorney fees and expenses of litigation. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 5/26/2010. (nbp) |
Filing 7 ORDER giving defendants ten (10) days from this date to cure jurisdictional defects of their removal. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 4/27/2009. (nbp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.