Cosby v. United States Marshals Service et al
| Jeannie L Cosby |
| United States Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 5:2009cv00192 |
| June 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Baldwin |
| Claude W. Hicks, Jr. |
| C. Ashley Royal |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 72 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis.Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 9/7/12 (lap)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER denying 65 Motion to Amend Judgment; denying 68 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 7/2/12 (lap)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 5/14/12. (lap)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 2/6/12 (lap)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 29 Report and Recommendations and denying 14 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 8/4/10 (lap)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 7 Report and Recommendations. Defendants Chapman, Bradley, and Reyes are DISMISSED. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 8/28/09 (lap)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Jeannie L Cosby. Ordered by U.S. Mag Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on 7/29/09. (CWH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
